POV is everything

When I was a kid, I had the usual Joan of Arc obsession. I thought she was the coolest thing ever. When my fourth-grade teacher assigned us to write a fictional letter by a historical figure, mine was written by Joan. (And yes, I burned off the edges of the paper.)

I loved Joan. Loved the dauphin. Loved the French.

Then, several years later, I discovered Shakespeare. Hated the “tragedies” but loved the comedies and histories. Loved Henry V. Quoted the speech: “We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.” (No, I didn’t know who Saint Crispin was, but that’s beside the point.)

I loved Henry V. Hated the dauphin. Hated the French.

And then came the crisis: Henry V and Joan of Arc were fighting on opposite sides, but in the same (much larger) war. The dauphin Joan supported, whom I cheered so fiercely, was the successor to the dauphin whom I’d booed with such enthusiasm when Henry V opposed him. In fact, it was the claim to the French throne by Henry VI, son of Henry V, that led to the siege of Orleans! (He was a child at the time and this was done in his name, but you get the idea.)

POV is everything. A sympathetic main character can sway you, can influence you, without your even being aware of it. A charismatic figure can inspire personal loyalty that transcends a bigger conflict, which allows me to cheer both Joan of Arc and Henry V despite their opposing political and military goals.

I don’t really have much of a point here. Just a Monday-afternoon ramble :-)

as if we needed one

This article provides yet another reason to love Ursula LeGuin.

(I did mention one of the books, The Road, here.)

incentive!

Everyone in my family reads, and even though we live all over the place, we often read the same things (the Economist being a big favorite).

I recently sent some books to a sibling (including A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian, which I recommend), and lo and behold, in return I received Salmon Fishing in the Yemen, by Paul Torday, and A Dirty Job, by Christopher Moore.

I’m looking forward to reading them–once I get through the pile of manuscripts on my desk.

on the nightstand

For the last two days I have been reading Corpse: Nature, Forensics, and the Struggle to Determine Time of Death.

I blame Reese for this.

And my father, who was a pathologist and who instilled in me a fascination for such things.

Thus far I’m enjoying it, which I suppose is an odd thing to say about such a work. But it’s well written, engaging, chock full of research without being dry, and very interesting. The one problem I have with it is the use of certain slang terms that might not age well – “circular file system,” for example. There are some terms that might drop out of popular usage that will date the book and/or become unclear in the future. Other than that, though, it’s good stuff.

In other news, Joan Armatrading, one of my favorite musicians, has the #1 album on the Billboard and iTunes blues charts. Yay!

Tags: ,

A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian

I just finished reading this book, and it was wonderful. The author, Marina Lewycka, is of Ukrainian heritage, and she has done a fabulous job of capturing not only the mindset, but the hybrid language (and insults!) of her characters.

This is the story of a Ukrainian family living in England. The father, an eightysomething widower, is in love with a voluptuous young Ukrainian woman. Very voluptuous, and very young. Needless to say, his two adult daughters are skeptical of her motives. The book is by turns hysterically funny and heartbreaking. It deals with the issues of ageing parents, East/West, war and peace, and historical truth vs. perception. The last page is pure genius: it left me with a smile on my face that stayed there for hours.

This is a wonderful book, and I highly recommend it.

The Road

Almost twenty years ago, I spent a week in a hospital in Czechoslovakia. I was in pain and groggy, not entirely sure what was going on. A friend came in every afternoon and read to me. Ulysses, by James Joyce. It was magical. The words soared, they dipped and they ran together and they sang. I’m sure the drugs had something to do with it, not to mention the euphoria of hearing English for more than five minutes at a time, but I’ll never forget the sheer joy I felt at Joyce’s use of language.

By definition, language is an important element in literature. But sometimes, sometimes, through careful use of language an author is able to add an extra dimension to the story being told.

This weekend, I finished reading The Road by Cormac McCarthy. It is the best book I’ve read in quite some time. The setting is the Southeastern United States, after some sort of apocalyptic event. The primary characters are a man and his son, who are walking along the road. Where they’re going, why they’re going, is never fully explained: it could just be the basic human need to keep moving, to not give up.

Part of the reason I liked it so much was the author’s use of language. The book itself is not that long, and there’s a lot of white space on the page. Easily readable in a day or two. But I didn’t want to do that. I rationed the pages, wanting to think. To reflect. To make sure I wasn’t missing anything.

Every word was chosen carefully and precisely. The prose is as stark and bare as the landscape it’s describing. The dialogue between father and son is laconic and unvarying–which is as it should be. The father is really the only company the boy has ever known, and speech is learned. Contractions sometimes appear without apostrophes, and words and phrases are used in a way that’s not quite right. But how better to mirror a society that is breaking down, where the old rules are mostly gone but new ones haven’t yet taken their place?

And yet, as much as I liked the book, I can’t say that I enjoyed it. It was dark, and it was difficult, and it scared me. But it also dealt with issues like faith, and hope in the face of overwhelming destruction. It’s not an easy read, but it’s worth it. The best book I’ve read in years.